Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
Last Updated: 21.06.2025 02:41
Right?
What? It’s okay for David to be both a man after God’s own heart and a Bloody Bipolar Adulterer who even desecrated what was holy, as long as he wasn’t Bisexual, right? Lol
Where?
Scholars and translators know this. The Greek translation of Arsenokoitace is uncertain. The word was coined by Paul (probably) or a contemporary of his. Any person who says they know exactly what Paul meant is lying (seriously).
(So please, before you enforce celibacy on another, castrate yourself … or leave other people alone?)
Men interpret Scriptures certain ways, but Jesus said we make void the Word by our tradition. Groupthink is tradition.
How did China develop DeepSeek with less than 50 million USD when Trump is saying we need billions?
Many believe Paul is writing about what he sees, temples that have male and female prostitutes engaged in ritual activities.
Him and I are good and that’s all I need.
Sodom and Gomorrah. Two cities completely filled with Gay men, young and old. Cities who recently had gone to war, who Abraham had rescued, who Lot went back to live among, who tried to rape two angels that they mistook for men … I guess.
If you embrace the fact that David “embraced” Jonathan and God was cool with it, you find that your concepts about what God “hates” get thrown out.
Homophobia is a billion dollar business for Corporate Christianity. Isn’t it?
Christ bore that, so, hard pass, thanks.
Bitcoin Price (BTC) News: Testing $110K Level Again - CoinDesk
No. Rape is violence, not sex. The story is about kidnapping into slavery and the abuse of strangers.
Didn’t they read Galatians? Romans? James and his “Law of Liberty.” The entire New Testament? You can even find Grace in the Old Testament, some of the Rabbis have.
Further Musings:
Do you think the constitution and laws should be taught in school?
Since Paul is who most homophobes run to in order to support their case, I went to him first, there really isn’t much left.
Last, Leviticus. Two almost identical verses. One sex act (If translated correctly. The Hebrew words are sparse. People debate everything).
Answer to: Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
Southwest Floats First Class, Lounges, Long Haul Flying: Good Strategy? - One Mile at a Time
Inhospitable, loathsome, yet leave it to homophobia to twist it and miss it (the verse they use in Jude fails the test because of this).
Those women were shunned, shamed, casted out and abandoned. The man had all the power and Jesus dared to challenge that. Even His disciples were astounded.
Try to break free from the shackles of it and you will find yourself outside the fold Pastor.
The truth is, the Old Testament and New Testaments say next to nothing and sexual orientation is a relatively new concept.
Does He?
These were common in that culture in Athens, Corinth, Ephesus, Rome, and Crete, all places Paul went. They existed centuries after Paul.
Citigroup lifts banking curbs on gun makers and sellers - NBC News
Christ bringing up Genesis is not Him being exclusionary, it is Him reminding these lecherous men that their wives are bound to their hearts.
In Romans chapter 1, verses 26–27 are cherry-picked out of the context which starts in verse 18. The context is Idolatry.
(What do you think he would write a line or two about?)
Bruce Willis’ Family Share Heartbreaking Health Update on ‘Die Hard’ Star - TV Insider
If anything, Paul was writing about male prostitutes, not LGBT.
No one knows.
Today we have Divorce courts, protections, child custody, child and spousal support.
I am not a Jewish man. I’m am not under any part of the Law for my righteousness. To place myself under the Law for my righteous standing with God would be to put myself under the curse of the Law listed in Dt 28.
Mt 19 is about Divorce. Jesus’ reference to Celibacy is that it is a gift from God and that not everyone can receive it.
There were Male Shrine Prostitutes in the OT book of Kings, that practice was old in Paul’s time. Many dismiss the idea based what seem to be personal or sociological reasons, not archaeological ones.
Why can’t some Christians?
Why is it the Legalists always run to the Law?